Cyber Insurance Readiness Snapshot
A directional questionnaire for scoring common underwriting control families and identifying evidence gaps.
Use template Email me the ExcelFree Templates
Start with practical templates that help organize control evidence, owners, freshness dates, and safe-to-share materials before a deadline creates pressure. Choose a workbook below and AgileCT will send the Excel link to your inbox.
Sample deliverables
These fictional examples demonstrate the format of an evidence checklist and remediation plan. They contain no client information and do not report completed work or verified controls. Actual scope, owners, priorities, and dates are agreed for each engagement.
On a small screen, scroll each table horizontally to see all columns. Keyboard users can focus a table and use the left and right arrow keys.
| Review question | Evidence to request | Owner | Example status and sharing rule |
|---|---|---|---|
| Is MFA required for administrator access? | Current admin account list, enforced MFA settings, and documented exceptions for the scoped systems. | IT lead | Settings summary received; coverage not yet checked. Internal only until redacted and approved. |
| Can a critical backup be restored? | Dated restore test record showing the system tested, outcome, elapsed time, and unresolved errors. | IT provider | Backup schedule supplied; restore test record missing. A schedule does not establish recoverability. |
| Who responds to a privacy incident? | Current escalation procedure, role assignments, contact list, and exercise notes where available. | Privacy owner | Draft procedure awaiting owner confirmation. Personal contact details removed from external copies. |
| Gap and action | Owner | Illustrative target | Closure evidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| MFA coverage unknown: reconcile administrator accounts with enforced settings and document exceptions. | IT lead | Day 14; subject to access and owner availability. | Reviewed account-to-setting record; exceptions resolved or recorded with an authorized risk decision. |
| Restore evidence missing: agree the test scope, run a restore, and investigate failures. | IT provider | Day 30; requires a safe test environment. | Dated test results and business owner confirmation of the recovery outcome; unresolved failures remain open. |
| Escalation roles unconfirmed: assign response owners and walk through a fictional incident. | Privacy owner | Day 45; requires stakeholder attendance. | Approved role list, exercise notes, and a follow-up record for issues identified. |
A target date is a plan, not proof that a fix is complete. Record completed work and supporting evidence separately from accepted risks or deferred actions. Sample formats updated .
Get The Workbook
You can still preview the web version first. The email request helps AgileCT understand which readiness pressure brought you here and follow up with practical notes, not a sales blast.
Templates
A directional questionnaire for scoring common underwriting control families and identifying evidence gaps.
Use template Email me the ExcelA working structure for carrier question mapping, evidence inventory, 30/60/90 remediation waves, exception tracking, and broker-ready summary.
Use template Email me the ExcelA practical worksheet for privacy safeguards, breach readiness, vendor privacy risk, customer review evidence, and remediation owners.
Use template Email me the ExcelA permission-aware answer bank for enterprise customer reviews, mapped to owners, evidence, approval status, review dates, and sharing rules.
Use template Email me the ExcelPractical Guides
Connect security work to risk reduction, governance, evidence, cyber insurance readiness, customer reviews, and resilience.
Read guidePrepare control evidence, owners, broker context, and remediation dates before renewal pressure turns urgent.
Read guideReview privacy accountability, safeguards, breach workflow, vendor oversight, and evidence readiness.
Read guideBuild approved answers, evidence permissions, gap language, and reusable review workflow without overclaiming.
Read guideStatistics Canada adoption and cost data, and what it changes about your next renewal or first application.
Read guideField Checklists
Assess software vendors, MSPs, processors, and outsourced operations before approval or renewal.
Read checklistCheck whether proof is current, scoped, owner-confirmed, safe to share, and ready for review.
Read checklistMove findings into 30/60/90 waves with owners, target dates, validation evidence, and exception handling.
Read guideHow It Fits
Insurance evidence can be reused for customer security reviews when freshness and scope are clear.
Privacy and security readiness outputs can feed a trust pack without overclaiming certification status.
Each reusable answer should have an owner, evidence source, review date, external sharing rule, and remediation status where a gap remains open.
Next Step